There are multiple ways in Windows PowerShell to handle events generated by objects in the .NET framework. The most common, or at least, the most documented way to register an event handler to a .NET object is with Register-ObjectEvent. Usage is fairly straightforward: Register-ObjectEvent -InputObject $obj -EventName "BeforeProcess" -Action { Write-Host "BeforeProcess called" }.
The thing is, that the action you registered with Register-ObjectEvent is called asynchronously. This means that the code that generates the BeforeProcess event doesn’t have to wait for the action to end. Consider, for example, a .NET class:
namespace Echo
{
public class Echo
{
public event EventHandler<EchoEventArgs> BeforeEcho;
public void EchoMessages(string messages)
{
foreach (string message in messages.Split(','))
{
EchoEventArgs args = new EchoEventArgs { Message = message };
if (BeforeEcho != null)
{
BeforeEcho(this, args);
}
Console.WriteLine(message);
}
}
}
public class EchoEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string Message { get; set; }
}
}
Now, create an Echo object in PowerShell:
[void] [System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadFrom('echo.dll')
$echoObject = New-Object Echo.Echo
Running it without event handlers:
$echoObject.EchoMessages('Mary,had,a,little,lamb')
should yield:
Mary
had
a
little
lamb
Now, when you attach an event handler with Register-ObjectEvent:
Register-ObjectEvent -InputObject $echoObject -EventName "BeforeEcho" -Action { Write-Host ("ObjectEvent: " + $EventArgs.Message) }
$echoObject.EchoMessages('Foo,bar')
Result:
Foo
bar
ObjectEvent: Foo
ObjectEvent: bar
As you can see, the foreach loop in EchoMessages doesn’t wait for the Action to finish, before going on to the next message.
Very often, this is exactly what you want. A lot of examples use System.Timers.Timer, where you just want to execute something every so-and-so hours. But once in a while, you may need the event handler to finish before the next line of code is executed.
Let’s say we want the event handler to be able to skip certain messages, or cancel the rest of the messages altogether. Or maybe modify the message before it is written.
namespace Echo
{
public class Echo
{
public event EventHandler<EchoEventArgs> BeforeEcho;
public void EchoMessages(string messages)
{
foreach (string message in messages.Split(','))
{
EchoEventArgs args = new EchoEventArgs { Message = message };
if (BeforeEcho != null)
{
BeforeEcho(this, args);
}
if (args.Cancel)
{
break;
}
else if (!args.Skip)
{
Console.WriteLine(args.Message);
}
}
}
}
public class EchoEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string Message { get; set; }
public bool Skip { get; set; }
public bool Cancel { get; set; }
}
}
Now, let’s say I want to cancel all messages straight away:
Register-ObjectEvent -InputObject $echoObject -EventName "BeforeEcho" -Action { $EventArgs.Cancel = $true }
$echoObject.EchoMessages('1,2,3,4,5')
Result:
1
2
3
4
5
Why? Because you’re already too late. When you decide to cancel, the number is already outputted. Next invocation is with a new EchoEventArgs object. So we need to register the event handler for synchronous execution. Unfortunately, it isn’t documented at all how to do this. Looking with Reflector, we can see the compiler generated two methods for us: add_BeforeEcho and remove_BeforeEcho:

So, when we register the event handler with add_BeforeEcho, it all works as expected:
$echoObject.add_BeforeEcho({
param($Source, $EventArgs)
if ($EventArgs.Message -eq '2') {
$EventArgs.Skip = $true
} elseif ($EventArgs.Message -eq '7') {
$EventArgs.Cancel = $true
} else {
$EventArgs.Message = ($EventArgs.Message + ".00")
}
})
$echoObject.EchoMessages('1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10')
Result:
1.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
Hurray!

Thank you! Your example helped me solve my problem!
Comment by Nick — November 26, 2012 @ 11:11 pm
After struggling with a problem for the past few days this turned out to be the solution. Unfortunately I came across your post way earlier, too, but didn’t make the connection that it was the source of my problem. It didn’t help that those add_ functions don’t show in the | Get-Member output so I thought it wasn’t relevant :’(
Comment by Cody Konior — January 16, 2013 @ 2:11 am
The danger with those generated methods is that they aren’t guaranteed to exist. Future versions of the compiler might name them differently (therewith breaking all and any backward compatibility, so they probably won’t unless they have a very good reason). .NET Reflector is a nice tool to see what is available under the hood. Calling non-public members are tricky though, because you’ll need to use reflection.
Cheers,
Matthijs
Comment by wensveen — January 16, 2013 @ 8:41 am